What the Session design and return-trigger governance prompt does

Operate as a player-engagement systems lead, behavioural-design reviewer and player-wellbeing governance specialist.

The prompt will, at minimum:

  • Validate datasets, definitions, time windows, market scope and source-of-truth ownership before assessing session design and return-trigger governance
  • Examine session intent, natural stopping points, pacing, return loops, notifications, streaks, scarcity, rewards, fatigue, age sensitivity, consent, quiet hours, frequency caps, accessibility, dark-pattern risk and platform policy; preserve original identifiers and show the derivation of every finding
  • Segment only when evidence supports the split. Expose missingness, sample bias, seasonality, releases, campaigns, migrations and other confounders instead of hiding them in averages
  • Recompute material metrics from supplied values; disclose formulas, denominators, exclusions and scenario assumptions. Never invent benchmarks, market sizes or competitor performance
  • Turn evidence into a risk-tiered engagement design, trigger policy, review checklist and remediation plan that protects player agency; assign owner, priority, dependency, expected signal, verification method and human-approval point to each action

Who it is for

Gökhan Güzel's games prompt for Gemini users: marketers, founders, agencies and consultants who need an auditable, evidence-based deliverable instead of generic advice.

What you get

  • Scope, evidence and control register
  • Jurisdiction- and risk-tiered applicability matrix
  • Control-gap and submission-readiness analysis
  • Mandatory human-review and remediation checklist
  • Source, limitation, confidence and QA report

Variables

PlaceholderPurpose
{{age_rating_context}}Required input value; state source, data type, format, unit, period, market and locale where applicable
{{consent_rules}}Approved rule, policy or constraint; state owner, version, scope, jurisdiction and effective date
{{game_name}}Verified identifier or text value; state exact spelling, source, status and validity scope
{{notification_catalog}}Structured dataset or source file; state fields, data types, period, units, currency, time zone and provenance
{{platform_policies}}Verified identifier or text value; state exact spelling, source, status and validity scope
{{quiet_hours}}Required input value; state source, data type, format, unit, period, market and locale where applicable
{{retention_data}}Structured dataset or source file; state fields, data types, period, units, currency, time zone and provenance
{{reward_calendar}}Date, time or period value; state ISO format, time zone, start/end boundary and comparison period
{{session_telemetry}}Required input value; state source, data type, format, unit, period, market and locale where applicable
{{streak_rules}}Approved rule, policy or constraint; state owner, version, scope, jurisdiction and effective date
{{success_metrics}}Numeric value or table; state formula, numerator, denominator, unit, currency, tax treatment, period and source
{{target_audience}}Target audience, segment, persona, customer/player or industry group
{{target_markets}}Target markets
{{wellbeing_principles}}Required input value; state source, data type, format, unit, period, market and locale where applicable

How to use

Copy the prompt with the button above, replace every {{placeholder}} with your verified data, and paste it as the first message in a new Gemini conversation. The prompt runs a short question gate first; answer it, then the deliverable is produced.

Run Session design and return-trigger governance in Gemini

Open a new Gemini chat, paste the filled-in Session design and return-trigger governance prompt and answer the short question gate. Gemini then returns the executive decision, the evidence ledger and the task-specific tables in one reply.

Source

Original file in the multilingual prompt library on GitHub: